Hardware comparison
MacBook Pro / Mac Studio M5 Max (36GB) vs NVIDIA RTX 4070 (12GB) for local LLMs
How the two stack up for running open-source LLMs locally — memory, bandwidth, price, and how many of the 69 tracked models each one can run.
Scroll sideways to compare both machines. Keyboard: focus the table, then use the arrow keys. Metric names stay visible.
| Hardware | MacBook Pro / Mac Studio M5 Max (36GB) | NVIDIA RTX 4070 (12GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | 36.0 GB (better for this comparison) | 12.0 GB |
| Bandwidth | 460 GB/s | 504 GB/s (better for this comparison) |
| Price (approx) | $2,499Complete system | $549GPU only · host PC required, sold separately |
| LLMs it runs | 51 of 69 (better for this comparison) | 30 of 69 |
| Best model it runs | Gemma 4 31BQ4_K_M · estimated 15–22 tok/s | Mistral Small 3.2 24BQ2_K · estimated 35–53 tok/s |
These prices cover different purchases: a GPU card excludes its required host PC; a complete system includes the machine. No price winner is marked. Prices are approximate catalog estimates; check current configurations and prices before buying.
The recommended models and quants differ. These estimated speeds are not a like-for-like comparison. Estimates use 4,096 context tokens, llama.cpp and one stream.
The MacBook Pro / Mac Studio M5 Max (36GB) runs 21 more of the tracked models (51 vs 30), thanks to its 36.0 GB of memory. The NVIDIA RTX 4070 (12GB) has more memory bandwidth (504 GB/s). Higher bandwidth can help generation speed, but model, quant, architecture and runtime also affect the estimates.