Skip to content
can-i-run-this-llm

Hardware comparison

MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (48GB) vs NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32GB) for local LLMs

How the two stack up for running open-source LLMs locally — memory, bandwidth, price, and how many of the 69 tracked models each one can run.

Scroll sideways to compare both machines. Keyboard: focus the table, then use the arrow keys. Metric names stay visible.

MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (48GB) compared with NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32GB) for local LLM inference
HardwareMacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (48GB)NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32GB)
Memory48.0 GB (better for this comparison)32.0 GB
Bandwidth307 GB/s1792 GB/s (better for this comparison)
Price (approx)$2,299Complete system$4,399GPU only · host PC required, sold separately
LLMs it runs54 of 69 (better for this comparison)52 of 69
Best model it runsGemma 4 31BQ3_K_M · estimated 12–18 tok/sGemma 4 31BQ5_K_M · estimated 50–75 tok/s

These prices cover different purchases: a GPU card excludes its required host PC; a complete system includes the machine. No price winner is marked. Prices are approximate catalog estimates; check current configurations and prices before buying.

The recommended quants differ. These estimated speeds are not a like-for-like comparison. Estimates use 4,096 context tokens, llama.cpp and one stream.

The MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (48GB) runs 2 more of the tracked models (54 vs 52), thanks to its 48.0 GB of memory. The NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32GB) has more memory bandwidth (1792 GB/s). Higher bandwidth can help generation speed, but model, quant, architecture and runtime also affect the estimates.

What the MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (48GB) runs →What the NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32GB) runs →Open the calculator →