Skip to content
can-i-run-this-llm

Hardware comparison

MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB) vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada (48GB) for local LLMs

How the two stack up for running open-source LLMs locally — memory, bandwidth, price, and how many of the 69 tracked models each one can run.

Scroll sideways to compare both machines. Keyboard: focus the table, then use the arrow keys. Metric names stay visible.

MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB) compared with NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada (48GB) for local LLM inference
HardwareMacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB)NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada (48GB)
Memory64.0 GB (better for this comparison)48.0 GB
Bandwidth307 GB/s960 GB/s (better for this comparison)
Price (approx)$2,699Complete system$6,800GPU only · host PC required, sold separately
LLMs it runs57 of 6957 of 69
Best model it runsGemma 4 31BQ3_K_M · estimated 12–18 tok/sGemma 4 31BQ8_0 · estimated 20–30 tok/s

These prices cover different purchases: a GPU card excludes its required host PC; a complete system includes the machine. No price winner is marked. Prices are approximate catalog estimates; check current configurations and prices before buying.

The recommended quants differ. These estimated speeds are not a like-for-like comparison. Estimates use 4,096 context tokens, llama.cpp and one stream.

Both run the same number of models, but the MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB) has more memory (64.0 GB), so it can hold larger models at higher quality. The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada (48GB) has more memory bandwidth (960 GB/s). Higher bandwidth can help generation speed, but model, quant, architecture and runtime also affect the estimates.

What the MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB) runs →What the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada (48GB) runs →Open the calculator →