Skip to content
can-i-run-this-llm

Hardware comparison

MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB) vs AMD RX 7900 XTX (24GB) for local LLMs

How the two stack up for running open-source LLMs locally — memory, bandwidth, price, and how many of the 69 tracked models each one can run.

Scroll sideways to compare both machines. Keyboard: focus the table, then use the arrow keys. Metric names stay visible.

MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB) compared with AMD RX 7900 XTX (24GB) for local LLM inference
HardwareMacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB)AMD RX 7900 XTX (24GB)
Memory64.0 GB (better for this comparison)24.0 GB
Bandwidth307 GB/s960 GB/s (better for this comparison)
Price (approx)$2,699Complete system$949GPU only · host PC required, sold separately
LLMs it runs57 of 69 (better for this comparison)51 of 69
Best model it runsGemma 4 31BQ3_K_M · estimated 12–18 tok/sGemma 4 31BQ3_K_M · estimated 40–60 tok/s

These prices cover different purchases: a GPU card excludes its required host PC; a complete system includes the machine. No price winner is marked. Prices are approximate catalog estimates; check current configurations and prices before buying.

Both estimated speeds use the same model and quant shown above. Estimates use 4,096 context tokens, llama.cpp and one stream.

The MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB) runs 6 more of the tracked models (57 vs 51), thanks to its 64.0 GB of memory. The AMD RX 7900 XTX (24GB) has more memory bandwidth (960 GB/s). Higher bandwidth can help generation speed, but model, quant, architecture and runtime also affect the estimates.

What the MacBook Pro / Mac mini M5 Pro (64GB) runs →What the AMD RX 7900 XTX (24GB) runs →Open the calculator →