Skip to content
can-i-run-this-llm

Hardware comparison

Mac Studio M5 Ultra (256GB) vs NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB) for local LLMs

How the two stack up for running open-source LLMs locally — memory, bandwidth, price, and how many of the 69 tracked models each one can run.

Scroll sideways to compare both machines. Keyboard: focus the table, then use the arrow keys. Metric names stay visible.

Mac Studio M5 Ultra (256GB) compared with NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB) for local LLM inference
HardwareMac Studio M5 Ultra (256GB)NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB)
Memory256.0 GB (better for this comparison)128.0 GB
Bandwidth1228 GB/s (better for this comparison)273 GB/s
Price (approx)$9,499Complete system$4,699 (better for this comparison)Complete system
LLMs it runs65 of 69 (better for this comparison)62 of 69
Best model it runsHunyuan Hy3 (MoE)Q3_K_M · estimated 52–78 tok/sGemma 4 31BQ2_K · estimated 13–20 tok/s

Both prices cover complete systems. Prices are approximate catalog estimates; check current configurations and prices before buying.

The recommended models and quants differ. These estimated speeds are not a like-for-like comparison. Estimates use 4,096 context tokens, llama.cpp and one stream.

The Mac Studio M5 Ultra (256GB) runs 3 more of the tracked models (65 vs 62), thanks to its 256.0 GB of memory. The Mac Studio M5 Ultra (256GB) has more memory bandwidth (1228 GB/s). Higher bandwidth can help generation speed, but model, quant, architecture and runtime also affect the estimates.

What the Mac Studio M5 Ultra (256GB) runs →What the NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB) runs →Open the calculator →