Skip to content
can-i-run-this-llm

Hardware comparison

Mac Studio M5 Ultra (96GB) vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 “Strix Halo” (64GB) for local LLMs

How the two stack up for running open-source LLMs locally — memory, bandwidth, price, and how many of the 69 tracked models each one can run.

Scroll sideways to compare both machines. Keyboard: focus the table, then use the arrow keys. Metric names stay visible.

Mac Studio M5 Ultra (96GB) compared with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 “Strix Halo” (64GB) for local LLM inference
HardwareMac Studio M5 Ultra (96GB)AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 “Strix Halo” (64GB)
Memory96.0 GB (better for this comparison)64.0 GB
Bandwidth1228 GB/s (better for this comparison)256 GB/s
Price (approx)$5,499Complete system$1,999 (better for this comparison)Complete system
LLMs it runs60 of 69 (better for this comparison)57 of 69
Best model it runsGemma 4 31BQ8_0 · estimated 21–32 tok/sGemma 4 31BQ2_K · estimated 12–19 tok/s

Both prices cover complete systems. Prices are approximate catalog estimates; check current configurations and prices before buying.

The recommended quants differ. These estimated speeds are not a like-for-like comparison. Estimates use 4,096 context tokens, llama.cpp and one stream.

The Mac Studio M5 Ultra (96GB) runs 3 more of the tracked models (60 vs 57), thanks to its 96.0 GB of memory. The Mac Studio M5 Ultra (96GB) has more memory bandwidth (1228 GB/s). Higher bandwidth can help generation speed, but model, quant, architecture and runtime also affect the estimates.

What the Mac Studio M5 Ultra (96GB) runs →What the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 “Strix Halo” (64GB) runs →Open the calculator →