Skip to content
can-i-run-this-llm

Hardware comparison

Mac mini M6 (16GB) vs NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB) for local LLMs

How the two stack up for running open-source LLMs locally — memory, bandwidth, price, and how many of the 69 tracked models each one can run.

Scroll sideways to compare both machines. Keyboard: focus the table, then use the arrow keys. Metric names stay visible.

Mac mini M6 (16GB) compared with NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB) for local LLM inference
HardwareMac mini M6 (16GB)NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB)
Memory16.0 GB128.0 GB (better for this comparison)
Bandwidth153 GB/s273 GB/s (better for this comparison)
Price (approx)$899 (better for this comparison)Complete system$4,699Complete system
LLMs it runs30 of 6962 of 69 (better for this comparison)
Best model it runsMistral Small 3.2 24BQ2_K · estimated 10–15 tok/sGemma 4 31BQ2_K · estimated 13–20 tok/s

Both prices cover complete systems. Prices are approximate catalog estimates; check current configurations and prices before buying.

The recommended models differ. These estimated speeds are not a like-for-like comparison. Estimates use 4,096 context tokens, llama.cpp and one stream.

The NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB) runs 32 more of the tracked models (62 vs 30), thanks to its 128.0 GB of memory. The NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB) has more memory bandwidth (273 GB/s). Higher bandwidth can help generation speed, but model, quant, architecture and runtime also affect the estimates.

What the Mac mini M6 (16GB) runs →What the NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128GB) runs →Open the calculator →